[Not enough votes – 2 more needed] | Rate this page
5.0 out of 5 from 3 votes
3 votes
0 votes
0 votes
0 votes
0 votes
CloseFollowing the latest government cuts, many non profits risk losing funding, staff or services. Understanding such risks and how best to mitigate them can be key to your organisation’s survival.
A good way to identify the risks associated with the management and operational processes for the organisation or project is to hold a brainstorming session. The aim should be to identify risks, without going on to debate or assess them at this stage.
A typical local voluntary organisation should think about potential risks within each of the following areas:
Risk assessment involves rating each risk against the two dimensions below.
The ‘probability’ aspect of risk assessment involves deciding how likely it is that the risk will occur. Each risk should fall into one of three categories:
The ‘impact’ aspect of risk assessment involves considering what the potential impact of the risk would be on the organisation, client or project. Each risk should fall into one of three categories:
Risk mitigation actions might include:
Once you have defined the actions for each risk, you will need to estimate the resources, workload and costs for each action. You can then assess the resources and costs against the risks to decide whether they are sensible and in proportion.
There are four aspects to consider when assessing contingency:
This is the standard of client performance or service that has been promised to a grant provider or advertised externally. In general, an organisation will promise around five to ten per cent less than the standard they believe they can achieve on a routine basis.
This area of contingency covers the amount and timing of the funds or income that needs to be raised. Most organisations would not want to assume that the funding they have been promised will come into the organisation in full and on time, so will try to commit
resources only when the funding is assured. Some organisations align core funding areas with more certain sources of income and other services or resources with smaller, less certain funding sources. It can also be sensible to hold an appropriate level of funding in reserve.
This contingency relates to the completion date of a project or the date at which a certain level of performance is achieved. The typical contingency is to quote a later completion date than is necessary, to allow for things that might go wrong.
Project costs or ongoing operational costs, including inflation, should be a major area of contingency. The management team might decide to forecast a somewhat higher cost than they believe they can achieve, to allow for additional costs and resources that would be required if things go wrong or the project runs for longer than planned.
How-tos are written by the users of this site; they can be anyone working within the charity sector. By sharing knowledge we can all support each other across the sector and help make things better.
How-tos are collaborative - we encourage other users to add to, edit and update existing how-tos as they see fit. Changes can also be undone. Don't worry, you can't 'break' anything!
If we see inappropriate or abusive behaviour we will prevent that user from making changes.
So log in, join in, and help make a difference!

Voluntarius wrote on Aug 30, 2011 09:37 PM
I am interested to know if there is a free or inexpensive tool available that can show a summary of data from a risk assessment matrix in the form of a 'heat map' diagram/chart with Probability and Impact axes? (Preferably with the ability to filter different categores of risk).
If not, I will just have to create one myself!